This site has now been visited
times since the counter was installed.
This page is unindexed (so far); please scroll away.
(05 Jun 03)
[I choose to call this project the "TRUNNEL" because all good
projects
need a catch-phrase and "CHRUNNEL", a perfectly logical acronym,
is to all intents unpronounceable.]
A general map of the area and proposed right-of-way follows:

The article puts forth an initiative called MoveNY (I can find no further reference to any such but I''m hot on the trail), calling for the immediate construction of a rail tunnel under the inner harbor; unfortunately, the co-chairman of the group is quoted as saying that the need for a tunnel is highlighted by terrorist activities. That argument is simply ridiculous; a rail tunnel would be one of the easiest targets for sabotage but that is no reason not to proceed.
The plan is also supported by many regional planning organizations and is promoted primarily by the New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC), which calls it the Cross Harbor Freight Movement Project. The EDC has a comprehensive review of this project on its site and is moving forward with an Environmental Impact Stataement (EIS).
The TRUNNEL would be restricted to rail traffic (like the Chunnel, which is dedicated solely to rail traffic); however, rail links between the LIRR and the Northeast Corridor line could be incorporated as well.
The Trunnel concept is primarily focused on relieving autotruck traffic into and out of Manhattan and the southwest corner of Long Island (the Brooklyn-Manhattan- Williamsburgh bridges and Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel* (I-478) tunnel bottleneck), both for the benefit of that area and for the motorist facing interminable delays transiting NYC. It is an easy engineering feat (vis-à-vis the Chunnel).
The Trunnel would directly link two economically powerful areas of two major states - the New York City metropolitan area, and northeastern New Jersey; there would be a great enhancement of employment and commerce and existing (and significant) commutation would be greatly eased.
This is an old idea, not at all unique to me, the Pennsylvania Railroad proposed it in 1893 and again in 1903, and it resurfaced in the 1920s and again in late 1941.
This is a project whose time has come and which would show vision and practicality. Goods which now take all day to get around the Manhattan bottleneck would arrive in minutes. Let's all get behnd it (all obviously would not include the New York Cross Harbor Railroad, the rail-float operations of which would instantly cease on the opening of the tunnel, unless they acquired the operating rights, a move that would probably be hotly contested by the New York & Atlantic Railway, which runs all freight on Long Island on trackage leased from the LIRR.
To further develop the concept, oil and natural gas pipelines might be incorporated in the project, allowing direct transfer of these resources between northern New Jersey, a major refinery and storage area, and Long Island, a major consumer.
MoveNY claims the Trunnel would take nearly 15 million tons of freight from area roads
and bridges annually.
(06 Jun 03)
Perhaps it should be explained that modern TOFC (trailer on flat car) and high-cube
cars and stack trains can not fit through the old, existing rail tunnels from the
Pennsylvania Railroad portals in North Bergen, New Jersey, under the North (so-called
Hudson) River, under Manhattan and through Pennsylvania Station, under the East
River, and into Sunnyside Yard in Sunnyside (Long Island City), Queens, on Long
Island. The LIRR Bay Ridge Branch (on the RoW of the former
New York Connecting Railroad and now operated by the New York & Atlantic) runs
from the 65th Street Yard in Bay Ridge up across Brooklyn and Queens, to Fresh Pond
Junction, where it interchanges with the LIRR and CSX, Providence & Worcester, and
Canadian Pacific, and into Sunnyside Yard (another LIRR, and Amtrak, interchange)
and also up across the Hell Gate Bridge to Oak Point Yard in the Bronx, the latter
service operated by the former Conrail as CSX and CP and also interchanging with the
Delaware & Hudson.
(06 Jun 03)
To contact S. Berliner, III, please click here.
© Copyright S. Berliner, III - 2001, 2002, 2003 - All rights reserved.
Return to Top of Page