This site has now been visited
times since the counter was installed.
PAGE INDEX: On this page (some background follows):
While appreciating Mr. Wiemer's arguments, this writer suggests one major change in routing, however; instead of running from Oyster Bay, in Nassau County, New York to Rye, in Westchester County, New York, the tunnel should be routed from Syosset, Nassau County, New York and under the northwestern corner of Lloyd Neck to the Noroton-Norwalk region of Fairfield County, Connecticut, perhaps coming ashore under Long Neck Point, only some 5½ miles (9km) across the Sound. The reason for proposing this routing is that the Rye landing favors southbound or westbound off-island traffic to the detriment of northbound or eastbound off-island traffic and vice-versa. Travelers heading for upstate New York or New Jersey would not be seriously inconvenienced by a Connecticut landing and those heading for New England and Canada would be greatly helped. Those heading for central or southern New Jersey and points south or west (Washington or Pennsylvania, etc.) already have a NYC bypass in the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge crossing; going through Rye would require transiting NYC or detouring all the way north to the Tappan Zee crossing. Crossing to the Noroton area, east of congested Stamford, gives northbound traffic access to Route 7 at nearby Norwalk, Route 8 at Bridgeport, and I-91 at New Haven, while eastbound traffic has access to both I-95 and the Wilbur Cross Parkway to Providence and Boston.
The acronym "CONNYL" has been chosen to represent the CONNecticut (CONN.) New York (NY) TunneL, in the same manner as "CHUNNEL" is the acronym for the England to France CHannel TUNNEL and " STRUNNEL" is the acronym for the U.S. (Alaska) to Russia (Siberia) Bering STRait TUNNEL.
On 28 September 1992, the writer sent a proposal for a Bering Strait Tunnel to the Clinton for President headquarters in Little Rock, which he or his staff ignored (of course), and re-sent it on 09 March 1993 when President Clinton was about to meet in Vancouver with Russian President Yeltsin and Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney (again it was ignored). It was a serious proposal in the first place and still merits serious consideration. On 17 July 1999, a reminder of the proposal was sent to the White House and a similar message was sent to Canadian Governor General Roméo leBlanc (Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's links didn't work) on 28 July 99, both referring to that proposal and the Strunnel page on this Website, with a later follow-up letter to M. Chrétien, all (unsurprisingly) to no avail. More recently, new proposals were sent to President Bush and again to Prime Minister Chrétien, with copies to V.P. Cheney, Gov. Knowles of Alaska, Premier Dosanjh of British Columbia, Premier Duncan of the Yukon, and to the appropriate U.S. Secretaries and Canadian Ministers and the AAR. After all these years, serious interest is at long last beginning to surface on both sides of the border.
Similarly, building up a steady pressure for the present Connyl proposal will eventually
bear fruit; the need is pressing and the technology, as Mr. Wiemer points out in his
excellent editorial, is quite readily available.
The Connyl concept is primarily focused on relieving automobile traffic into and out of the northwest corner of Long Island (the Triborough-Whitestone-Throg's Neck bridges bottleneck), both for the benefit of that area and for the motorist facing interminable delays transiting NYC. It is an easy engineering feat (vis-à-vis the Chunnel).
A general map of the area and proposed right-of-way will follow.
The Connyl would directly link two economically powerful areas of two major states - the North Shore (Gold Coast) of long Island, New York, and Fairfield County, Connecticut; there would be a great enhancement of employment and commerce and existing (and significant) commutation would be greatly eased.
Obviously, detailed surveys of the possible RoW locations would have to be made on both sides of the Sound before any final RoW could be laid out.
To further develop the concept, oil and natural gas pipelines and high-tension electrical cables might be incorporated in the project, allowing direct transfer of these resources between the two states, provided safety was paramount.
The Connyl can work and will pay for itself in a few years. It can be done; all
we need is vision and leadership.
Geological Considerations
As noted above, there are no major considerations in crossing the Sound; the project
lies well within the available technology; there are several methods available,
including a coaxial tube arrangement with the inner tube suspended in a flooded
outer tube, a long, gradual "S"-curve in the tunnel, flexible, pressure-tight swivel
joints, and the like.
Most of the work on the Long Island end will be in glacial moraine (sand and clay). By starting the Long Island adit (sloping tunnel) immediately north of the present end of I-135 just north of Jericho Turnpike, in previously-condemned property, environmental impact there is minimized and the adit would start at a relatively low spot and bore under the high Harbor Hill terminal moraine, avoiding all surface work in the very communities which fought Moses and the Rye-Oyster bay bridge to a standstill.
The only serious threat faced is the possibility of ship collision at the landward ends if the tubes lie on the Sound bottom instead of being under the bottom.
The CHUNNEL had massive 55m (180') diameter construction shafts sunk inland even before the adits (sloping tunnels) were built from the surface even further inland. Should such be required on Long Island, there is ample open land in the northwest corner of Caumsett State Park, where such work could be done without cutting trees or having any significant adverse effect on the environment; equipment and materials could be barged in to spare the local roads, especially the Lloyd Neck Causeway.
An air shaft and construction access (if one is even required) might be bored inshore
on Great Island, a peninsula on the northeast end of Long Neck Point and a ramp for
automobile traffic could fit in nicely between the Stamford-New Canaan line and
Ponus Point Road north of the Merritt Parkway and only some 3 miles from Exit 35.
This would leave trucks in the middle of nowhere, however. The arterial
highway running north out of the middle of Norwalk (to link with Route 7), from Exit 15
on the Connecticut Turnpike (I-95) through Exit 39/40B on the Merritt Parkway (Route
15), would be an ideal access, but it starts in an inconceivably-dense section of Old
Norwalk, an historic district to boot! However, if a shaft (if one is even needed)
were bored at Manresa Island at the southwest corner of Norwalk Harbor and the
land between the Metro North/Amtrak line on the south and the Connecticut Turnpike
on the north, east of Triangle Street in Norwalk and west of the Norwalk-Westport
line, and even south of the tracks just west of the intersection of the Turnpike (Exit
17) and Saugatuck Avenue, were used for the tunnel mouth, access for all types of
vehicles to the Turnpike would be immediate, and it is only three miles west to the
arterial highway and Route 7 for any northbound traffic and the Merritt Parkway for
automobiles heading east or west along the shore and shunning the Pike.
The original 09 June 2001 concept
{This is an old idea, not unique to me, and 09 Jun 2001 is when the ideas all jelled, precipitated by the NEWSDAY article -( added 16 Jun 01).}
Kennedy had his 'man on the moon' dream and we actually did it. How about something not quite so monumental, but a tremendous shot in the arm for Long Island's, New York's, Connecticut's, and New England's economies.
Turkey bridged the Bosporus, Japan built its Tsugaru Straits tunnel between Honshu and Hokkaido, TransManche Link completed the Chunnel between England and France, and now Italy is acccepting bids for an enormous Straits of Messina bridge to connect Sicily and the mainland (a two-mile suspension bridge)! Why don't we build a tunnel under Long Island Sound and link the Island with Connecticut and the rest of New England? We no longer have any significant ferry interests and the construction industries can use a boost.
By tunneling, we would minimize the environmental impact and avoid the hazards of weather and the need for massive bridging.
This is a project whose time has come and which would show vision and practicality. Goods which now take all day to get around the Queens bottleneck would arrive in an hour or so. Cross-Sound tourism would skyrocket and inland attrections, such as the New England Air Museum and the Trolley Museum in the Hartford area, and the aquaria and other shore attractions, such as Mystic Seaport and the Branford Trolley Museum, as well as the Native American casinos, would all benefit.
I have not researched the route any further to date.
For examples of the latest in tunnelling equipment, methods, and projects, visit the site of the Herrenknecht companies.


(08 Oct 02 map by and © 2002 S. Berliner, III - all rights reserved)
{Thumbnail image - click on picture for a larger image]
See also the TRUNNEL (New York Harbor Tunnel) page.
(05 Jun 03)
To contact S. Berliner, III, please click here.
© Copyright S. Berliner, III - 2001, 2002, 2003 - All rights reserved.
Return to Top of Page